Choose the smallest change that solves the problem
A first draft may have the right direction but need a correction. The headline might be too long, the composition may need adjustment or the product reference may not have been followed closely enough. Diagnose the problem before deciding whether to edit or regenerate.
The current product connects generation results to a canvas editing flow. Editing capabilities depend on the asset and the controls available in that workflow. A flattened generated image should not be assumed to contain fully editable text and object layers.
Edit, regenerate or choose another format
| Situation | Useful next step |
|---|---|
| The concept works and a supported element needs a small correction | Use the available editor controls and inspect the export. |
| The product shape or scene is fundamentally wrong | Return to the reference and generation brief. |
| The layout is too crowded for the message | Shorten the content or choose a more suitable template. |
| The idea needs several explanatory steps | Move it into a carousel rather than shrinking the text. |
Example: simplify an overfilled promotional visual
For an illustrative service announcement, the first draft might include a headline, three benefits, opening hours and a long booking instruction. The main problem is not necessarily typography. The message may be trying to do too much in one frame.
Keep the primary benefit and a clear next step in the image. Put supporting context in the caption or a separate slide, while retaining essential conditions wherever they are needed. Then review the new design at the size someone will actually see it.
Review after the last change
A small edit can affect the rest of the design. Moving a logo may cover a product detail; a longer date can force a line break; a crop can remove a qualification. Review the whole image after the last change instead of checking only the edited area.
When a change affects an approved message, return the relevant work to review. Keep the revised export clearly distinguished from the earlier version so the publisher does not select the wrong file.
Build a more reliable next draft
If the same correction happens repeatedly, improve the starting brief or template. Add the preferred headline length, approved logo treatment and spacing requirements to the brand guidance. Repeated manual repair is a signal that the input needs attention.
Use Brand Kit for reusable context and creative templates for a consistent structure. Keep the output review even when the initial direction becomes more reliable.